Category: Fettish

Fettish – The Tickle Table – Anna Kovachenko and Lana Blade



I hadn’t seen this Ukrainian duo (LOVE their accents don’t you?) since this years con, but I had to book them immediately afterward. This is a busy pair after all, and no wonder!

I get both beauties sealed up, strapped down and ready to go.

And yes, they’re strapped to each other also.

Since socks have been popular, I left Lana in her white ones for the first few minutes of the clip, before removing them, and zipping her toes together to match Anna, who was set to go.

Oh what fun we had. Fingers, the TGun 2, flosser, and of course I had to play games with string, since both of these gorgeous girls have highly sensitive toes.

Twenty minutes later the carnage was complete. But I had so much fun it seemed like a mere 3 minutes. Time flies when you’re having fun.

Length: 20:53
Resolution: 1920×1080


Download – The Tickle Table – Anna Kovachenko and Lana Blade

Fettish – No Safeword – Roze and Greasy Rose



Title: “No Safeword Challenge: Roze’s Tickling Nightmare”

“I’m Lab Director Derek, and welcome to the No Safeword Challenge. If you are not familiar understand the recording process will be slightly unorthodox from our usual method. Once this begins, even if the camera were to tip over or lightning strike, the experiment shall not cease. You will witness this live, as it occurs.

Today, our brave volunteer Roze has agreed to undergo this extreme tickling experiment. Her task is to endure our most intense techniques without a safeword. Let’s see if we can break her mentally.

Roze, you’re securely fastened to the Tickle Table v2. Your ankles are clamped, and your toes are bound in an extreme flex position, connected to the ratcheting system. Your mouth is gagged, and you won’t be able to speak or stop us once we begin.

You’ve chosen to endure this for 10 minutes. Remember, once we start, there’s no stopping until the timer goes off. Are you ready, Roze?”

(The tickling begins, with both the Lab Director and Greasy Rose using various tools and techniques to torment Roze’s bare feet)

10 minutes later…

“Time’s up, Roze. Let’s remove your gag and see how you’re doing. How was your experience?”

(Roze’s post-scene interview)

Roze: “It was… fun!”

Lab Director: “Fun? That’s not the response we’re looking for, Roze. The purpose of the No Safeword Challenge is to mentally overwhelm the individual, not provide enjoyment. Unfortunately, our experiment has failed this time. Better luck next time, Roze.”

Length: 15:09
Resolution: 1920×1080


Download – No Safeword – Roze and Greasy Rose

Fettish – Tickle Therapy – Roze and Greasy Rose



1

Full foot containment achieved through nylon reinforcement Specimen’s laughter registers at 89dB (notable 12% increase from baseline when GR dragged fingernails along medial arch) Fabric tear procedure induced 3-second apnea episode → heightened vulnerability
2

Right foot: Terrorizers applied at 300RPM (oil seepage between toes observed) Left foot: Brush pattern follows Fibonacci sequence for maximum nerve cluster activation Scrubbed until specimen utilized her safeword
3

Electickle deployment caused spinal arch attempt (14cm lift from back padding) Specimen’s protest (“Not that spot!”) interpreted as desirable resistance per Protocol 12 Pupillary dilation suggests adrenal surge during polarity swap

Length: 14:16
Resolution: 1920×1080


Download – Tickle Therapy – Roze and Greasy Rose

Fettish – Tickled in Steel – Angel



Title: “Knismesis vs. Gargalesis: Can a Subject Exhibit Both Feather-Sensitivity and Heavy-Handed Reactivity? A Case Study on Specimen Angel”

Abstract:
This study examines the paradoxical physiological responses of Specimen Angel, a novel test subject at the lab, to determine whether hyper-sensitivity to light touch (knismesis) and intense reactivity to deep-pressure stimuli (gargalesis) can coexist within a single subject. Through systematic application of tactile tools (finger tickling, Doomfeather variants, large feathers, and a vibrating toothbrush), we evaluate Angel’s reactions across high-sensitivity zones (underarms, feet, inner thighs, etc.) to quantify her position on the spectrum between delicate feather-ticklishness and intense heavy-handed responsiveness.

Methodology:

Restraints: Angel was secured in the Tickled in Steel rig, ensuring immobility via leather sheaths, straps, and reinforced steel rods. Stimuli: Finger Tickling: Light, teasing strokes vs. deliberate digging. Doomfeather Variants: High- and low-speed vibrational modes. Large Feathers: Broad, sweeping contact vs. targeted flicking. Vibrating Toothbrush: Focused, rapid oscillations on nerve-dense zones. Protocol: Digital manipulation induced Confusion between Confusion between tool applications to reset baseline reactions.
Observational Data:
(Record maximal reactions per stimulus/zone

[REDACTED]

This section intentionally hidden, with observers fresh, non influenced notes encouraged to avoid coloring results.

Discussion:
Angel’s results defy conventional binary classification. She exhibited both extreme knismetic sensitivity (e.g., feather-induced spasms) and gargaletic overload.

Conclusion:
Specimen Angel occupies a rare niche on the ticklishness spectrum: a hybrid reactor . Her dual sensitivity implies that neuronal pathways for knismesis/gargalesis may overlap or synergize in certain subjects. Further studies should explore whether this phenomenon correlates with bondage-induced adrenaline surges or psychological vulnerability.

Length: 15:27
Resolution: 1920×1080


Download – Tickled in Steel – Angel